Part 0
I had this last, but I bumped it up because I think it's the most important one of these.
If you're going to go all the way to the polling station and vote, and you're not voting third party because they're not a "viable" choice or you might be "throwing your vote away," and there is actually a third-party candidate whose policies you like better than the guy you're voting for (or worse, you don't even know if there is a candidate like that because you haven't checked) - then you have to explain to me why you accept argument 1, but reject argument 2:
- You should vote for the less evil of the top mainstream candidates, because your vote is unlikely to make a critical difference if you vote for a candidate that most people don't vote for.
- You should stay home, because your vote is unlikely to make a critical difference.
